Which case is referenced as the standard for analyzing claims of excessive force by law enforcement officials?

The case that serves as the standard for analyzing claims of excessive force by law enforcement officials is Graham v. Connor. This landmark decision established the "objective reasonableness" standard for evaluating claims of excessive force under the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that the assessment of whether an officer's use of force is excessive must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, taking into account the circumstances at hand. This ruling emphasized the need to consider the totality of the circumstances, including the threat posed by the suspect, the severity of the crime, and whether the suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to flee.

The other cases listed address different legal principles. For example, Miranda v. Arizona established the requirement for Miranda warnings during custodial interrogations to protect against self-incrimination. Tennessee v. Garner addressed the use of deadly force in the context of apprehending fleeing felons. Finally, Riley v. California dealt with the search of a cell phone without a warrant during an arrest, focusing on privacy rights. While all these cases are important in their own contexts, Graham v. Connor specifically pertains to excessive force evaluations by law enforcement.